APPROVAL COORDINATION

Miami Beach seawall permits: City, DERM and other approvals

A grant application is not a seawall permit. Build a project-specific approval plan covering City requirements, County environmental review, and any other agencies involved because of the location and proposed work.

Plan a call

Published by Miami Beach Seawall

Published · Updated

Separate City review from County environmental review

The City’s building process and Miami-Dade’s Class I environmental process address different requirements. The County explains that most work in, on, over or upon tidal waters or coastal wetlands requires a Class I permit, subject to specified exceptions. Confirm the applicable route with the authorities and your project professionals; a grant decision is separate.

Other agency involvement depends on the project

The County identifies possible state, federal, water-management and municipal involvement depending on location, nature, type and size of work. This can include FDEP, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or SFWMD. Do not assume every project has the same four approvals, or that one approval replaces another.

Keep one approval responsibility tracker

For each row, record who confirmed applicability, who prepares the documents, and who must act next. Ask which submissions require signed or sealed professional work and which owner authorizations are needed. Our planned coordination does not replace those professionals.

Use this worksheet offline. Scroll sideways on a small screen, or print/save this page with your browser. Blank cells are for your own copy; nothing is entered or sent here.

Project-specific agency and status worksheet
Approval / applicability questionResponsible personStatus / referenceNext action
City building / zoning requirementsBlank for your offline recordBlank for your offline recordBlank for your offline record
County Class I / applicable exceptionBlank for your offline recordBlank for your offline recordBlank for your offline record
State / federal / water-management review, if neededBlank for your offline recordBlank for your offline recordBlank for your offline record
Grant approval and eligible scopeBlank for your offline recordBlank for your offline recordBlank for your offline record
Inspections and closeoutBlank for your offline recordBlank for your offline recordBlank for your offline record

Plan around dependencies, not a universal sequence

The agencies may have linked requirements or review comments. Keep the current approved documents together and record changes rather than assuming the first submitted plan is the final authorized scope.

  • Establish the proposed scope and identify the measurements and design documents needed.
  • Confirm the approval paths and who handles each submission or response.
  • Resolve the grant’s approval-before-work and reimbursement conditions separately.
  • Before starting, have the responsible professionals confirm the required approvals, conditions, inspection arrangements and construction scope.

A processing target is not a total project schedule

County Ordinance 25-73 changed Class I procedures and establishes timing provisions tied to specified conditions. Application completeness, review responses, design, other approvals and project conditions still matter. A processing target or an individual City review cycle is not a promise of end-to-end approval or construction completion. Use a current project-specific schedule rather than an undated search snippet.

Track the finish as well as permission to start

Ask which inspections, completion certifications, final records and closeout actions apply. Assign responsibility for obtaining and retaining them. For a reimbursed project, separately confirm which completion evidence the program needs. Do not begin construction solely because a quote is signed or a grant form was submitted.

Planning information only, not an inspection, engineering or legal advice, compliance determination, or quote. Confirm project requirements with the City and qualified professionals.